[45081] in Cypherpunks
Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Black Unicorn)
Sun Dec 10 02:53:17 1995
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 02:49:08 -0500 (EST)
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951210023002.18670G-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
Brian Davis wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 8 Dec 1995, Black Unicorn wrote:
> > You've taken the narrow answer I was trying to give out of context.
> > As for fifth amendment questions, That's another discussion entirely. If
> > this was not an error, then you have still taken the question way beyond the
> > narrow scope I was addressing.
>
> You are correct: I didn't realize/remember/whatever that you were
> limiting the remarks to the narrow scope you set forth below.
> And on the point you were addressing, I agree with you.
>
> Sorry to have added the fog ...
Not a problem
I could have been clearer.
> Not a lawyer on the Net, although I play one in real life.
> **********************************************************
> Flame away! I get treated worse in person every day!!
---
My prefered and soon to be permanent e-mail address: unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
