[44491] in Cypherpunks
Re: Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (solman@MIT.EDU)
Sat Dec 2 14:40:50 1995
From: solman@MIT.EDU
To: solman@MIT.EDU
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 02 Dec 1995 14:31:48 EST."
<9512021931.AA01944@ua.MIT.EDU>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 1995 14:35:58 EST
What I meant to say, was that the encryption protocol is secure versus
a computationally unbounded passive adversary AND REQUIRES NO PRIOR
COMMUNICATION.
Sorry 'bout that,
Jason W. Solinsky
