[44312] in Cypherpunks
Re: "Got a subpoena?"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Hupp)
Thu Nov 30 20:08:58 1995
From: "Jeff Hupp" <jhupp@novellnet.gensys.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 18:57:41 -0500
Reply-To: JHupp@Gensys.Com
On 30 Nov 95 at 12:56, Jay Campbell wrote:
: >> "finessing" laws will become more important. In short, they WILL have
: >> a subpoena--then what?
: >
: > Then they'll find out that I don't have any information that
: >could help them, anyway.
:
: What about a court order to (a) start comprehensive logging, and (b) not
: tell anyone under penalty of ______ .
And at that point, you shut down the remailer and log each and every
bounce.
Now, they could get an order forcing you to run a remailer ~ but that
would open up a whole new can of worms i.e. can you be forced, under
court order, to commit a crime?
--
JHupp@gensys.com |For PGP Public Key:
http://gensys.com |finger jhupp@gensys.com
Autocracy is based on the assumption that one man is wiser
than a million men. How's that again? I missed something.
