[119256] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

NYC to collect more DNA

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anonymous)
Wed Oct 20 13:07:35 1999

Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 18:49:50 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <199910201649.SAA22631@sofuku.monster.org>
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@algebra.com
Reply-To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>





              New York to expand
              DNA testing of convicts

              October 20, 1999
              Web posted at: 10:25 a.m. EDT
              (1425 GMT)

              by CNN correspondent Gary
              Tuchman

              NEW YORK (CNN) -- New
              York will take DNA
              samples from ten times as
              many convicted criminals as
              it currently does, under a new law which expands the
              number of offenses subject to compulsory testing. 

              Under the present law, only eight percent of convicted
              criminals in the state are obliged to give DNA samples. 

              The new law, which goes into effect on December 1,
              increases the number of offenses included in the DNA
              sample requirement from 21 to 107, with burglary, arson
              and drug dealing added to the existing list which already
              includes most violent crimes. 

              Gov. George Pataki says the new
              law will result in 30,000 convicts a
              year giving samples instead of the
              current 3,000. 

              New York is the latest state to look
              at increased collection of DNA as a
              law-enforcement tool. Several
              states have increased the numbers of testing-eligible
              crimes and Louisiana gives DNA tests to everyone
              arrested. 

              While civil libertarians are concerned about the privacy
              implications of these laws, proponents point out that DNA
              evidence can prove innocence as well as guilt. 

              New York Police Department Commissioner Howard
              Safir said, "I can prove somebody innocent through DNA
              evidence. I need a lot more than DNA evidence to prove
              somebody guilty." 

              A further concern is the nationwide backlog of testing of
              the limited amount of samples now taken. 

              According to defense attorney Barry Scheck, there are
              already millions of eligible convicts whose DNA has not
              been collected, let alone tested. 






  





home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post