[119143] in Cypherpunks
Re: An article from Microsoft
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anonymous)
Sun Oct 17 12:55:12 1999
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 18:20:01 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <199910171620.SAA10321@sofuku.monster.org>
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Reply-To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
>>>>> mark galliart <mark@wi-ks.com> writes:
> http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/news/msnw/linuxmyths.asp
I predict that this article will serve only to dig a deeper hole for
Microsoft.
All of the (previously pro-MS) IT managers with whom I've discussed
this article recognise it for the pathetic collection of half-truths
that it is -- and their overwhelming reaction is that NT really *must*
have some serious problems if this is the best defence that Microsoft
can put up. Even the mainstream pro-MS magazines have been unable to
take _linuxmyths_ seriously...
-- NotAMongerAtAll
