[119032] in Cypherpunks
Re: The "We did not get anything back saying that it had not been delivered" case . . . (fwd)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Choate)
Wed Oct 13 12:35:14 1999
From: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-Id: <199910131627.LAA25001@einstein.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 11:27:15 -0500 (CDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
----- Forwarded message from Harmon Seaver -----
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 10:13:41 -0500
From: Harmon Seaver <hseaver@ah-gws.arrowhead.lib.mn.us>
Subject: CDR: Re: The "We did not get anything back saying that it had not been
delivered" case . . . (fwd)
The idea that the courts somehow think they can depend upon something
like this is ridiculous. Of course, they also figure they can give service via US
snailmail, which is equally absurd -- even 1st class mail wrongly addressed often
just gets tossed by the wrong recipient.
----- End of forwarded message from Harmon Seaver -----
Ahmen. I must get neighbors mail at least once a week. I either take it to
them or write a note on it about the incorrect address. This habit must be
pretty rare since I seldom get mail that way myself, and I know that I can't
be the only one getting incorrectly delivered mail. I guess most of the
folks who do get either trash it or get a chuckle out of it (and perhaps
the $20 Granny sent for that birthday).
It should actualy require face to face delivery of such notices as the only
acceptable method.
____________________________________________________________________
The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full
of passionate intensity.
W.B. Yeats
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
