[118699] in Cypherpunks
How interesting. (Australian defense organisation as asset concealers?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Black Unicorn)
Wed Oct 6 01:06:53 1999
From: "Black Unicorn" <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: "Cypherpunks@Cyberpass. Net" <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 23:48:44 -0500
Message-ID: <000601bf0fb6$11bf7dd0$06088818@zug>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: "Black Unicorn" <unicorn@schloss.li>
So out of the blue I get an email:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Smith [mailto:joe_smith84@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 11:14 PM
> To: unicorn@schloss.li
> Subject: your article: Practical and Legal Problems Confronting the
> Asset Concealer
>
>
> Black Unicorn,
> I just stumbled across two of your posts on Asset concealing.
>
> They are great. You obviously have an indepth understanding of this
> extremly complex issue.
>
> Two questions:
> I have parts I & II, can you e-mail me or direct me to III, IV and V?
> Do you have any reference on how this applies to Australian citizens?
>
> Thanks
> Joe
Well sure, but notice the originating IP:
203.102.38.193
aka
cig.defence.gov.au
Now surely the most likely explanation is that it's just some poor sap
looking to protect what little pay the government give him. Still, you have
to wonder. And you'd think they'd use better than hotmail to cover their
tracks.
Ah well.
