[117614] in Cypherpunks
Re: Build a better OTP?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Petro)
Tue Sep 7 04:29:08 1999
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <v04205504b3fa78cd8544@[208.176.30.20]>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990906184415.007f07b0@mail.intplsrv.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 01:11:37 -0700
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
From: Petro <petro@suba.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Reply-To: Petro <petro@suba.com>
>>If you're going to do this, consider the enhancement described by
>>Ueli Maurer, "Protocols for Secret Key Agreement by Public
>>Discussion Based on Common Information", from Crypto 92. A slightly
>>different version is avaiable from
>>http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/maurer/publications.html:
>
>I'll have to read up on it next time I connect for an extended time.
>I only have access to one phone line and its use is limited during
>the day.
lynx -crawl -traversal
--
Interfaces matter. You need mathematical bones; engineering muscle;
but you won't replicate without beautiful skin. Bits, transistors,
wires, code, gummint velveeta is free. Will is expensive. Gutenburg.
Smith. Ford. Moore. Postel. Steam engines were neat. Steam
engines pulling trains were amazing. Computers were neat. Computers
networked were amazing. Warning grunts are useful. The ability of a
charistmatic speaker to fuck with your head is disastrous.--Blank
Frank(anonymously)
