[117584] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Build a better OTP?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lucky Green)
Mon Sep 6 17:09:45 1999

From: "Lucky Green" <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
To: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@openpgp.net>, <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 13:57:59 -0700
Message-ID: <NDBBIFGOKODBCKDGJDKLOEKGCFAA.shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <199909061749.NAA24633@domains.invweb.net>
Reply-To: "Lucky Green" <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>

> >They're building it into their chip sets so if you buy a new computer
> >you'll probably get it automatically.  Soon, random bits will essentially
> >be ubiquitous.  Anyone who cares can have all the random numbers he
> >wants.
>
> >The data rate is in the megabytes per hour range so it would take a few
> >days to fill a CD.
>
> Yes but is it trustworthy?

Since Intel won't allow examination by the public of the raw bits, the
answer is "most emphatically not".

[See the various discussions about the Intel RNG and Intel's refusal to
allow access to the raw bits, thereby making meaningful analysis of the
quality of the RNG impossible].

--Lucky


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post