[117426] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: None, Thank you for your interest

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Roach)
Thu Sep 2 22:57:24 1999

Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990902213829.007e1c10@mail.intplsrv.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 21:38:29 -0500
To: cypherpunks@algebra.com
From: Sean Roach <roach_s@mail.intplsrv.net>
In-Reply-To: <00e091618090299DIRECT@direct.nai.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To: Sean Roach <roach_s@mail.intplsrv.net>

At 02:18 AM 9/2/99 -0700, Network Associates wrote:
>
>Dear None OfYourBusiness:
>
>Thank you for your interest in Network Associates* (formally 
>Network General*, McAfee Associates*, Pretty Good 
>Privacy*, Magic Solutions* and Trusted Information 
>Systems). The merger of these powerful companies 
>brings the most comprehensive collection of 
>"best of breed" network security and management solutions 
>ever assembled into a single integrated suite 
>running under Windows NT.   
...
Generally I find people using the list to maintain their own anonymity,
without regard for others annoying, but this had the potential of being
informative.

Also, I don't seem to recall any of these coming from a site other than
toad.  I know that I prefer sending my messages to the same server to which
I'm subscribed, and I suspect that that is part of human nature.

I also realize that the opinion of the vocal seems to be that those who
still use toad, with its history, are morons.  Perhaps ill-mannered should
be added to that opinion, and perhaps I should subscribe to it.

Hey, None OfYourBusiness, do you think you could use a mail to news gateway
to foreward your usual junk lists to alt.anonymous.messages or similar?

Hey anyone, would this work, and is it appropiate for that list?

Sean Roach


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post