[117236] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: ACTION ALERT: Crypto Legislation

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Declan McCullagh)
Sun Aug 29 13:59:41 1999

Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 13:40:22 -0400
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>, abd@cdt.org
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
In-Reply-To: <199908291618.MAA23834@smtp5.mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <19990829174311.PWVA15925@alaptop.hotwired.com>
Reply-To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

And on SAFE's likely negative impact on the Bernstein case... Remember, any
legislation that lets individuals post crypto freely probably wouldn't
survive a presidental veto. Thus the inevitable and thoroughly unpleasant
slide towards "compromise" begins... I think Solveig also mentioned some of
this in her policy analysis at cato.org. --Declan


http://www.pathfinder.com/time/digital/daily/0,2822,13344,00.html

                    because these bills are far from
                    perfect. In fact, they may be downright dangerous.

                    "Please, do no harm here. Let's keep what we
                    won," says Cindy Cohn, one of the lawyers
                    mounting an EFF-sponsored court challenge to
                    the White House's export rules. So far that effort
                    has been successful: A federal judge ruled last
                    December that the line-by-line instructions in a
                    computer program are "speech" and restrictions
                    on overseas shipments violate the First
                    Amendment. 

                    Cohn argues that both Rep. Bob Goodlatte's
                    (R-Va.) SAFE bill and Sen. Conrad Burns'
                    (R-Mont.) ProCODE bill could do more harm than
                    good. ... "What effect would
                    SAFE or ProCODE have? Either none or a
                    detrimental one," Cohn said on Monday at a
                    conference organized by the Electronic Privacy
                    Information Center.

http://www.pathfinder.com/time/digital/daily/0,2822,13344,00.html

                    "He shouldn't need to apply for a license," Tien
                    says of the bill's provision that any mass-market
                    encryption product that's publicly available can be
                    exported "after a one-time 15-day technical review
                    by the Secretary of Commerce." 

                    But the computer industry seems to think that any
                    legislation that satisfies Tien will surely not satisfy
                    the FBI.



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post