[116981] in Cypherpunks
Re: Ex-agent says device fired at Waco compound
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (AMP)
Tue Aug 24 19:29:44 1999
Message-ID: <37C326AD.6C3108D6@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 18:11:41 -0500
From: AMP <amp@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: AMP <amp@pobox.com>
This is obvious ass-covering. The evidence is now not under seal. They
=know= the texas rangers had evidence of flash-bangs used by the feds. I
belive they have 2 in evidence.
Hmmm... fellow in the article says they fired two...
hmmm... considering all the evidence the feds destroyed when they
bulldozed all of it into the still-smoldering wreckage, isn't it amazing
that =both= pyrotechnic devices they allegedly used were found?
the coverup continues.
Clinton and Reno need to be put in a burning house to see how they like
it.
You can quote me on that Jeff. (buttfucker list monitor)
amp
Anonymous wrote:
>
> <http://dallasnews.com/texas_southwest/0824tsw1teargas.htm>
>
> Ex-agent says device fired at Waco compound
>
> Justice Department denies item used
>
> 08/24/99
>
> By Lee Hancock / The Dallas Morning News
>
> ©1999, The Dallas Morning News
>
> A former senior FBI official has said that the agency fired two pyrotechnic tear gas grenades on the last day of the 1993 Branch Davidian siege, a day on which federal authorities have long insisted they used nothing capable of starting a fire.
>
> The former official, Danny O. Coulson, said in an interview that two devices known as M651 CS tear gas grenades were fired from FBI grenade launchers hours before the compound erupted in flames April 19, 1993. He said that they were used with permission from FBI supervisors but that they played no role in starting the fire.
>
> The federal government has consistently disputed accusations that the FBI started the fire that consumed the Branch Davidian compound with David Koresh and more than 80 followers inside. Government officials have maintained that the FBI used only nonburning devices to insert tear gas into the compound on April 19 because of fears that pyrotechnic tear gas might spark a fire in the flimsy wooden structure.
=snip
--
amp@pobox.com
http://zeugma.nu/
What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?
