[116957] in Cypherpunks
Re: Project: Hardening Crypto Against Big Brother's "Black Bag"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (steve bryan)
Tue Aug 24 11:18:38 1999
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <v04210100b3e85329f312@[204.1.1.99]>
In-Reply-To: <v04205505b3e76a5cd225@[216.112.5.39]>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 09:56:57 -0500
To: Petro <petro@suba.com>
From: steve bryan <sbryan@vendorsystems.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="=--==-=---=--====--=-===-=-==-=--=-=---=-===-===";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Reply-To: steve bryan <sbryan@vendorsystems.com>
--=--==-=---=--====--=-===-=-==-=--=-=---=-===-===
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>>There are some definite unacceptable aspects to the proposal...
...
> They want PERMISSION to break into your house when you aren't
>home to plant evid^h^h^h^h information gathering devices.
>
> This doesn't bother you?
Yes, it does bother me which is why I stated my position the way I
did. If they are demanding the routine privilege of employing this as
an investigative technique, I'd tell them to go to hell. However, if
they have enough other persuasive evidence to convince a judge that
they need this procedure to gather evidence needed for a conviction I
wouldn't rule it out. Of course if an investigator makes such
requests and no further evidence is found then he will lose
credibility and he may get his toys taken away.
--=--==-=---=--====--=-===-=-==-=--=-=---=-===-===
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBN8Ky0eR2gubafJrFEQKw9QCg/SyeYcS026fEdE7BSfLBeJz8XgoAmwVM
cp6tT+akVvAtMjh0VWH0VHTZ
=T2Ef
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
--=--==-=---=--====--=-===-=-==-=--=-=---=-===-===--
