[9792] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet
bill text draft 2: Telecommunications Competition Act
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John [Francis] Stracke)
Fri Jan 21 13:35:08 1994
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 1994 12:14:50 +0500
From: francis@avalle.insoft.com (John [Francis] Stracke)
To: u.washington.edu!adamfast@netcom.com
Cc: nii_agenda@world.std.com, com-priv@psi.com, cosndisc@bitnic.BITNET,
In-Reply-To: adam fast's message of Thu, 20 Jan 1994 22:36:23 -0800 (PST) <Pine.3.89.9401202257.K24313-0100000@goren1.u.washington.edu>
> (1) "Commercial network access point" means a place where
>interconnections between local and interlocal networks are made.
Careful on the wording. If a company has multiple offices in WA, then
the routers for their *private* net would be considered CNAPs; anybody
could connect, and the PUC could tell them where to put the routers.
Bzzt.
> (5) Specify the process for the location of commercial network
>access points, in accordance with chapter 36.70A RCW at neutral sites
>that are not owned or occupied by information transport providers;
Who *does* own them? The State? This seems like it's going to add an
extra layer of routing to everybody's net & slow things down.
Other than that, looks good to me. Wish I lived in WA. :-)
/===========================================================================\
|John (Francis) Stracke | My opinions are my own. |
|InSoft, Inc. |==================================================|
|Mechanicsburg, PA | I'm not a bibliophile, I'm a bibliophliac. |
|francis@insoft.com | Put me in a bookstore, & my wallet bleeds. |
\===========================================================================/
