[9726] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Another quickie on levels of telco service

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Clay Shirky)
Tue Jan 18 10:14:11 1994

From: Clay Shirky <clays@panix.com>
To: Gregory=Kushmerek%AcctgMed%FIN@humres-server.net.tufts.edu
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 1994 10:09:53 -0500 (EST)
Cc: com-priv@psi.com
In-Reply-To: <9401181411.AA01348@psi.com> from "Gregory=Kushmerek%AcctgMed%FIN@humres-server.net.tufts.edu" at Jan 18, 94 09:11:48 am

> 
> Dick St.Peter's notes:
> 
> > Karl's obviously correct that the cost of long distance service has
> > come way down.  We pay less (for long distance), but we get less too -
> > the "level" of service, to use Adam's term, has declined.  
> 
> I can't agree about the level of service.  Today, thanks to the market...

Nor I. I got a Sprint account the year it started up; my rates went down,
I could make calls on an 800 number from every pay phone and hotel room
in the country w/o paying exorbitant surcharges, as time went on I could 
do that from overseas as well, and whenever I have come across a rotary
phone their operators have placed the call for me at no extra charge.

Add to that the fact that I use SprintNet for data transmissions and their
network gives me *very* litle line noise, even when I've had to dial direct 
from Europe, and that this all costs less than it did when Ma Bell broke up,
and I have to say that I can't think of a single thing that *hasn't* 
improved with longdistnce service over the years.

-- 
Clay Shirky

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post