[9688] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet
Re: Some Thoughts on The National Science Board
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stan Barber)
Sun Jan 16 17:25:53 1994
From: sob@tmc.edu (Stan Barber)
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 1994 16:23:48 -0600
In-Reply-To: Sean McLinden <sean@dsl.pitt.edu>
To: Sean McLinden <sean@dsl.pitt.edu>, Hans-Werner Braun <hwb@upeksa.sdsc.edu>
Cc: Gordon Cook <cook@path.net>, com-priv@psi.com
I think one of the reasons that "peer review" is continued to be the way
such things are done is because noone has proposed something so much better
that those that care have been willing to endorse it. If Gordon feels he has
such a proposal, he should air it. If he does not, then he is not really
offering anything new and should just note that and move on. To do otherwise
is repetative and as such as waste of everyone's time.
--
Stan internet: sob@bcm.tmc.edu Executive Director, Technology
Olan uucp: rutgers!bcm!sob Architecture & Planning
Barber Opinions expressed are only mine. Baylor College of Medicine
