[9453] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Aikens last (but long) posting/comments on ISOC and related issues

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast))
Thu Jan 6 09:33:13 1994

To: Craig Partridge <craig@aland.bbn.com>
Cc: Craig.A.Finseth-1@umn.edu, ietf@ietf.cnri.reston.va.us, com-priv@psi.com,
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Jan 94 09:19:19 PST."
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 94 09:29:54 -0500
From: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast)" <dee@skidrow.lkg.dec.com>


>From:  Craig Partridge <craig@aland.bbn.com>
To:  Craig.A.Finseth-1@umn.edu
In-Reply-To:  Your message of Wed, 05 Jan 94 08:07:35 -0600.
	                  <199401051407.AA13402@norge.unet.umn.edu> 
Sender:  ietf-request@ietf.cnri.reston.va.us
>    I agree.  Here is a list of things that I would rather see the
>    Internet Society _not_ get involved in:
>
>    * group health plans
>    * "insignia" credit cards
>    * local chapters
>    * and, in general, anything else that tends to fill up my US mail mailbox
>
>On this note, I'd discourage ISOC from launching a bunch of new technical
>networking journals.  I've seen the circulation figures for a lot of the

I certainly agree.  Hard copy journals seem particularly silly for
internetworking.

>...

>Craig
>[and so you know all the conflicts of interest in this note :-)]
>Editor-in-Chief, IEEE Network Magazine
>member of steering committee of IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
>member editorial board of the Journal of High Speed Networks
>past Editor-in-Chief, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review

I suggest that authors consider simply submitting their papers as
Internet Drafts and, depending on the comments they receive, issuing
them as informational RFCs.

Donald


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post