[2229] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Why Can't we have Both Gigabit Testbeds AND Plug'n Play Slip?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gordon Cook)
Sat Feb 1 18:21:16 1992

To: com-priv@psi.com
Date: 1 Feb 92 17:46:12 EST (Sat)
From: cook@tmn.com (Gordon Cook)


<<MESSAGE from>> Gordon Cook                          01-FEB-92 17:46
                 cook@tmn
 Dave Farber says:
 
 the palce to spend my money is where it is - premarket -- to lead the way 
 and develop the seed technology.
 
 Dave.... I have no disagreement with that assertion.  Bravo for the 
 gigabit testbeds!
 
 A question that I do have is whether the NSF investment in the current 
 clear channel T-3 backbone fits this criteria?  Maybe others older and 
 wiser than I would like to venture their opinions.
 
 Yeah, private enterprise is developing slip software etc.  For some reason 
 however it has not yet developed plug in and play implementations of the 
 kind recently discussed on this list.  If federal money is to go into 
 making the network faster, and the Congress in its wisdom decides that it 
 is a national priority for the network to facilitate education, I still 
 have difficulty seeing why it would be poor policy to have the NSF issue a 
 solicitation for the prompt development of such software.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post