[191] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet
Re: There are no unrestricted networks.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David J. Farber)
Tue Dec 18 17:12:14 1990
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 90 16:45:43 EST
From: farber@central.cis.upenn.edu (David J. Farber)
To: "Martin Lee Schoffstall" <schoff@psi.com>
Cc: lear@turbo.bio.net (Eliot), com-priv@psi.com, mnemonic@eff.org
I gather its a federal law
Begin forwarded message:
Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 90 10:29:19 EST
Posted-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 90 10:24:04 -0500
To: farber@central.cis.upenn.edu (David J. Farber)
Cc: "Martin Lee Schoffstall" <schoff@psi.com>, lear@turbo.bio.net (Eliot),
com-priv@psi.com, mnemonic@eff.org
Subject: Re: There are no unrestricted networks.
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 18 Dec 90 05:53:40 -0500.
<9012181053.AA03999@pcpond.cis.upenn.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 90 10:24:04 -0500
>From: "Martin Lee Schoffstall" <schoff@psi.com>
David,
Is this a Pennsylvania law? Does it apply to the originating or the
serving telco, or both?
Marty
-------
I too am not a lawyer but we had a talk at Penn on the new law that is aimed a
t 900
call-sex phone services. This law requires the telcos to essentially monitor t
he
use of the services under penalty of law (one of the first of I suspect more
violations of the common carrier notions). Whether this will stand up in the c
ourts
remains to be seen. If it does we will see it impact us when networks become m
ore
visible.
