[10847] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: The FCC strikes the Internet (fwd)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Love)
Sat Mar 12 10:53:20 1994

Date: Sat, 12 Mar 1994 08:28:05 -0500 (EST)
From: James Love <love@essential.org>
To: com-priv@psi.com

Gordon Cook has posted David Farber's comments on two amendments to HR 
3636 to this list. This was my reply (with a few typos corrected) to 
David.  He has since replied again, suggesting that a conference might be 
a better forum for some of these issues.  In any event, here was my reaction.
-jamie

David, the language that you posted to Interesting-people really deals 
with two separate issues.  1). the FCC would be required to accept 
comments from the public on the future of democratic discourse via the 
internet, and comment specifically on whether or not telephone companies 
should be required at provide some type of flat rate access to the 
net, not as a monopoly provider, but as one of many ways that people get 
access to this network.  I don't think it will be the end of the world if 
this issue is debated openly, and we confront the future of the net with 
a privatized NSF backbone.  If you are so confident that FCC involvement 
isn't a good thing, you will probably carry the day by a huge margin, and 
perhaps I will agree with you.  Asking of an inquiry is just asking 
that this be dealt with in an open and democratic forum.

2).  The second part of the amendement referred to any entirely separate 
issue of how consumers are represented before the FCC.  Again, it is just 
a study to look at different models.

  Maybe I'm missing something, but why shouldn't there be some debate and 
analysis of these issues?

By the way, a number of persons were responsible for the legislative 
language that you quoted, and there is no need to worry about who gets 
the credit or blame, as the case may be.   

-  jamie

----------------------------------------------------------------------
James Love, Taxpayer Assets Project; internet:  love@essential.org
P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036; v. 202/387-8030; f. 202/234-5176
12 Church Road, Ardmore, PA 19003; v. 215/658-0880; f. 215/649-4066
----------------------------------------------------------------------




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post