[10631] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: "Fed **deal** may speed MCI's ATM rollout"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marvin Sirbu)
Wed Mar 2 16:37:37 1994

Resent-From: Marvin Sirbu <ms6b+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Resent-To: com-priv@psi.com
Date: Wed,  2 Mar 1994 14:17:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Marvin Sirbu <ms6b+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: cook@path.net (Gordon Cook)
In-Reply-To: <9403020919.aa19841@pandora.sf.ca.us>

Do you see a contradiction in the following two statements?  

Marvin

Excerpts from internet.com-priv: 1-Mar-94 "Fed **deal** may  speed MC..
by Gordon Cook@path.net 
>There is also an excellent chance that PSI and UUnet will not interconnect at
>the NSF sponsored NAPs.  If so it could have interesting implications for
>network connectivity.


Excerpts from bboard.com-priv: 2-Mar-94 Re: "Fed **deal** may speed.. by
Gordon Cook@path.net 
>Both PSI and UUNET are partner's with MFS and Sprint in MAE East and the first
>GIX.  It is probably safe to assume that they will stay in that and
will connect at the Washington NAP which MAE EAST and the GIX will
probably become.




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post