[10538] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Debating the NII "Truisms"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Love)
Sat Feb 26 18:50:03 1994

Date: Sun, 13 Feb 1994 20:22:38 -0500 (EST)
From: James Love <love@essential.org>
To: Stan Barber <sob@tmc.edu>
Cc: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>, tenney@netcom.com, com-priv@psi.com
In-Reply-To: <9402131516.ZM5914@TMC.EDU>

On Sun, 13 Feb 1994, Stan Barber wrote:

> Barry,
> Sounds like the SEC effort that the NSF is funding is something similiar to
> what you are discussing. It is alot of data in a very raw format.

    The SEC EDGAR data are the filings that private parties make to the 
government, for purposes of disclosure.  Only the government could 
compell the disclosoure.  Of course, the government isn't the author of 
any of these reports, but its a type of government information.
jamie

----------------------------------------------------------------------
James Love, Taxpayer Assets Project; internet:  love@essential.org
P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036; v. 202/387-8030; f. 202/234-5176
12 Church Road, Ardmore, PA 19003; v. 215/658-0880; f. 215/649-4066
----------------------------------------------------------------------



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post