[10502] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Privatize the Net

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gary Obermeyer)
Fri Feb 25 17:08:34 1994

Date: Fri, 25 Feb 1994 07:03:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Gary Obermeyer <obee@netcom.com>
To: Dennis Moncrief <moncrief@d3.com>
Cc: com-priv@psi.com, Jerry Berman <jberman@eff.org>
In-Reply-To: <199402242005.MAA07541@netcomsv.netcom.com>

Dennis, by this logic, would you also privatize highways?


On Thu, 24 Feb 1994, Dennis Moncrief wrote:

> As a new subscriber to comp-priv, I've enjoyed the wide ranging debate
> these last two weeks. Especially on such topics as proposed new Net rate
> structures, the changing role of government regulation and subsidy,
> Clipper, and egalitarian goals like guaranteed access for the masses.
> 
> My two cents worth: Privatize the Net
> 
> It's pointless to expect meaningful progress to result from "fine tuning"
> or even major reform to current government regulation regarding public
> networks. Privatization of a wholly commercial Net with a bare minimum of
> government regulation (keep the peace and defend property rights -the just
> role of the limited government defined in the US Constitution) and zero
> subsidy will result in the most rapid advancement and greatest benefit to
> all.
> 
> Free markets have historically proven more effective at delivering intended
> results across all areas of human endeavor than government programs or
> experiments in collusion and monopoly-building between big government and a
> few privileged big business insiders. Grand experiments based on the false
> assumptions of state socialism always cost more and deliver less than
> market driven initiatives undertaken by free enterprise.
> 
> Who among us can reasonably place our trust in our current government
> leaders - the same "leaders" who have run up an unprecedented national debt
> that threatens to bankrupt us all - to shepherd and "regulate" something so
> vital to global commerce and future prosperity as the Net. I say, get
> government out of the way and let business rock and roll! The Net is too
> important to trust to government. Let's get it right this time - it's
> business, not government, that efficiently creates new technology and turns
> it into wealth and prosperity.
> 
> 
> "I place economy among the first and most important virtues, and public
> debt as the greatest of dangers. . . we must make our choice between
> economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude.  If we can prevent the
> government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of
> caring for them, they will be happy."
>                                         -- THOMAS JEFFERSON
> 
> What would Thomas Jefferson have to say (were he alive today) about the
> appropriate role of the current administration regarding the public
> networks? Would Al Gore's National Information Highway hyperbole stand up
> under Jefferson's scrutiny as anything more than just more government. . .
> "wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of caring for them..."
> 
> ----
> Dennis Moncrief
> Internet: moncrief@d3.com
> 
> 
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post