[10207] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet
Re: NSB Meeting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gordon Cook)
Sat Feb 12 16:34:56 1994
From: cook@path.net (Gordon Cook)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 1994 21:33:40 GMT
Apparently-To: <com-priv@psi.com>
Sheesh Ross.... why not let the good Dr. Wolff defend his own actions?
You argument seems dreadfully stretched to me. The public didn't get a
fair chance to attend so we'll cancel the advertised public session and
deprive those two or 3 hardy souls who did come of their rightful window
into what we are doing. Mmmmmmmm.....this action protects the public
interest eh? What are they gonna do Ross.. reschedule and bring the NSB
back into town next week for a replacement meeting, or are you saying the
public interest can be protected the NEXT time around when in 3 months
the board meets again??
Now as to my "wild speculation".... Barrnet will NOT provide the
California NAP, PacBell very likely will. Check and see that I said I
was not 100% sure on that one. Other than that I'd say that so far my
predictions are holding up pretty well.
But go ahead and talk a about wild speculation....maybe you can confuse
some folk.
My hope is that some day soon you nobles peering down from your castle
ramparts at us peasants out here in the hinterlands realize the gap that
separates our perception of these issues from yours.
