[639] in bugtraq
Re: SERIOUS suppresion of academic/political speach at deakin
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Julian Assange)
Sat Jan 14 00:51:02 1995
From: Julian Assange <proff@suburbia.apana.org.au>
To: mouse@Collatz.McRCIM.McGill.EDU (der Mouse)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 1995 15:48:31 +1100 (EST)
Cc: bugtraq@fc.net
In-Reply-To: <199501062034.PAA28421@Collatz.McRCIM.McGill.EDU> from "der Mouse" at Jan 6, 95 03:34:57 pm
> It's different in many respects. In my opinion, one respect in which
> it does not differ is that it's inappropriate material for bugtraq, or
> more precisely that I have not yet seen anything that makes me think it
> is appropriate. Your first sentence, above, reads "produced ...
> material critical of AARNet security action would be taken ...", but it
> doesn't indicate whether the comma would go after "AARNet" or after
> "security". If the latter, there may well be some
> appropriate-for-bugtraq information involved - though even then, not
> unless software bugs were involved, I would say.
>
It should have been "AARNet security, action".
ie the paper I am writing shows holes in AARNet security which allows
serious fraud.
Proff
