[33312] in bugtraq
Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mariusz Woloszyn)
Mon Feb 2 21:55:50 2004
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:09:27 +0100 (CET)
From: Mariusz Woloszyn <emsi@ipartners.pl>
To: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br
Cc: computerguy@cfl.rr.com, BUGTRAQ@securityfocus.com
In-Reply-To: <40116C62.5010109@tco.net.br>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401291706370.22279@dzyngiel.ipartners.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br wrote:
> > Which means the Democrats screwed up setting up their own share point and
> > allowed public access to it. There was no "computer glitch" which was
> > "exploited". This was completely a human screw-up. And there was no
> > hacking ("exploitation of a computer glitch") done by the Republicans.
> > Unless you wish to call clicking on a share point configured with public
> > access and opening it up "hacking".
>
> AFAIK, "hacking" is legally defined in the USA as being unauthorized
> access to computer resources. It doesn't matter if the resource was
> adequately protected (or protected at all) in first place or not. If you
> were not given permission to make use of that resource, you are
> criminally liable.
>
Do you have an explicit permission to read the content of a www.cnn.com?
What is the difference between opening a web URL and a network share?
--
Mariusz Wołoszyn
Internet Security Specialist, GTS - Internet Partners
