[33243] in bugtraq
RE: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bugtraq@anastrophe.com)
Sat Jan 24 16:38:35 2004
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040124115342.0277bfe8@imap.anastrophe.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:55:31 -0800
To: "'BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS. COM'" <BUGTRAQ@securityfocus.com>
From: bugtraq@anastrophe.com
In-Reply-To: <E34C24EB8B70314292EB768E969D9EEA5BC541@svralbnmex01.southw
estre.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 01:45 PM 1/23/2004, B. Kinney wrote:
>I don't disagree with your opinion on the article - it was meant to be
>shock journalism. It's the only way they can get us to read anything
>about our political system.
>
>I still am of the nature that you don't go places you don't belong. If
>you need a more concrete example, think about the ladie's room. How old
>were you when you learned which door is NOT yours?
>
>Do you ever enter the wrong one with the intent of seeing something?!
>If you did, don't you think your friends and coworkers would find it
>inappropriate and disgraceful?
that wasn't the point of the followup. the point of the followup was that
the original poster elided critical information in order to slant the
message of the article to his particular political bias.
which is just as lame and dishonest as what the republicans did.
Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com
