[32438] in bugtraq
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Serious flaws in bluetooth security lead
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nosp)
Fri Nov 14 16:24:50 2003
From: nosp <nosp@xades.com>
To: Pentest Security Advisories <alerts@pentest.co.uk>
Cc: Jordan Wiens <jwiens@nersp.nerdc.ufl.edu>, bugtraq@securityfocus.com,
full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
In-Reply-To: <3FB4AC90.7060506@pentest.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1068825936.1642.37.camel@earth.xades.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:05:36 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 10:21, Pentest Security Advisories wrote:
[...]
> No, you didn't misread - The T610, whilst still vulnerable to some
> attacks, does provide more protection
> of OBEX profiles. In this respect, it's better than the other phones /
> devices we've tested.
>
> On the particular T610 that was tested, we found that whilst it was
> possible to upload files to the phone we could not download files from it.
It is very possible (and easy) to download (very) sensitive files from a
T610 as long as the MAC is known; no pairing necessary. Firmware rev
R3C002. Files include calendar and phonebook.
