[31461] in bugtraq
Re[2]: 11 years of inetd default insecurity?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (3APA3A)
Mon Sep 8 14:14:27 2003
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:07:00 +0400
From: 3APA3A <3APA3A@SECURITY.NNOV.RU>
Reply-To: 3APA3A <3APA3A@SECURITY.NNOV.RU>
Message-ID: <391241550.20030908140700@SECURITY.NNOV.RU>
To: psz@maths.usyd.edu.au (Paul Szabo)
Cc: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
In-Reply-To: <200309080026.h880QOc114306@milan.maths.usyd.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dear Paul Szabo,
--Monday, September 8, 2003, 4:26:24 AM, you wrote to 3APA3A@SECURITY.NNOV.RU:
>> -R 0 -s your_ad_can_be_here
PS> Your cure is worse than the disease: rate limiting allows a DoS
PS> against the service, no limit allows a DoS against the whole
PS> machine.
-s limits number of processes invoked from same IP. You can additionally
use -c to prevent distributed attack. It doesn't allow to DoS box and
doesn't disable service for 10 minutes.
--
~/ZARAZA
Ну а теперь, Уильям, хорошенько поразмыслите над данным письмом. (Твен)
