[2818] in bugtraq
Re: Write-only devices (Was read only devices)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gary Howland)
Wed Jun 26 13:20:31 1996
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 10:05:25 +0200
Reply-To: Bugtraq List <BUGTRAQ@netspace.org>
From: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list BUGTRAQ <BUGTRAQ@netspace.org>
DevilBunny wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 1996, Gary Howland wrote:
>
> > Or even a PC on the local lan with it's TX line cut?
> > That way no one will know it is there, but all (well, most, if using
> > UDP) log messages in the form of UDP packets could be logged.
>
> Sending unencrypted logs over a public network, what a great idea. Some
> of my logs actually contain passwds for failed logins and ppp connections.
Hence the term _local_ lan (yes, I know it's redundant - perhaps the
expression "private lan" would have been better).
I was trying to suggest an easier to set up and easier to program
alternative to the serial line approach.
> besides, with udp and listen only, there is no way *you* know the message
> has been received intact and or if it has been able to be writen to disk
> in time
The same is true with xmit only serial connections.
Gary
--
pub 1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22 Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Key fingerprint = 0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D 1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06
