[26637] in bugtraq
Re: IE SSL Vulnerability (Konqueror affected too)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thomas C. Greene)
Mon Aug 12 19:20:06 2002
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
From: "Thomas C. Greene" <tcgreene@bellatlantic.net>
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:41:11 -0700
In-Reply-To: <017901c23df8$ecc40bd0$22a4b5d4@fujitsu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <200208112241.11215.tcgreene@bellatlantic.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
http://theregister.co.uk/content/4/26620.html
[....]
I've not tested this on IE because several researchers posting to Benham's
BugTraq thread
(http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/286895/2002-08-08/2002-08-14/1)
have confirmed the behavior. But I did test it on Mozilla 0.9.4, which Benham
says isn't vulnerable, and Konqueror 3.0 (KDE 3.0.2 on SuSE 8.0), which he
doesn't mention.
Konqueror turned out quite vulnerable. Mozilla was not vulnerable, but I'm not
sure if that's because it handled the situation properly, or is, ironically,
somehow too buggy to be exploited.
I made a simple HTML file with links to the amazon URL. After associating
Benham's test-page IP with www.amazon.com in my hosts file I found that in
Konqueror, following a link to https://www.amazon.com brought me immediately
to the 'you've been hacked' page, indicating total failure. The behavior was
the same when I typed the URL into the address bar.
With Mozilla the URL, https://www.amazon.com simply went nowhere. No cert
warning, no 404, nothing. The browser simply remained on the page from which
I started. The behavior was the same when I typed the URL into the address
bar.
[....]
--tcg
http://theregister.co.uk
