[2392] in bugtraq
Re: SunOS syslog() fix, finally...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pug)
Fri Nov 10 19:42:33 1995
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 08:18:07 -0600
Reply-To: Bugtraq List <BUGTRAQ@CRIMELAB.COM>
From: Pug <pug@arlut.utexas.edu>
X-To: BUGTRAQ@CRIMELAB.COM
To: Multiple recipients of list BUGTRAQ <BUGTRAQ@CRIMELAB.COM>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951109112419.21517C-100000@matrix29> from "Jake
Luck" at Nov 9, 95 11:27:10 am
> > 102903-01 Solaris 2.3 (requires 101318-75)
> > 102904-01 Solaris 2.4 (sparc) (requires 101945-34)
> > 102905-01 Solaris 2.4 (ix86) (requires 101946-29)
> there did not seem to be any mentions about the need of recompiling
> sendmail, etc in the README file, which was mentioned in the cERT
> advisory. since it basically just patched the libc.a, I suppose no
> other modification is needed?
Uhh. If it only patched libc.a you *will* need to recompile. On the
otherhand, if it patched libc.so, it will dynamically pick up the new
changes if you have compiled it dynamically.
Ciao,
--
Richard Bainter Mundanely | System Analyst - OMG/CSD
Pug Generally | Applied Research Labs - U.Texas
pug@arlut.utexas.edu | pug@eden.com | {any user}@pug.net
Note: The views may not reflect my employers, or even my own for that matter.
