[17831] in bugtraq
Re: bitchx remote xploit
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (RaiSe)
Wed Nov 29 12:55:59 2000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011282315340.948-100000@apolo>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 23:30:08 +0100
Reply-To: RaiSe <raise@BIOGATE.COM>
From: RaiSe <raise@BIOGATE.COM>
X-To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU>
To: BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM
In-Reply-To: <20001127155828.A29671@drow.them.org>
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 12:15:09AM +0100, RaiSe wrote:
> > /*
> > * BitchX Xploit by RaiSe
> > * Tested with version 1.0c16(+) in: redhat 6.0 (2.2.16)
> > * redhat 7.0 (2.2.16)
> > * debian 2.2 (2.2.16)
> > *
> > * NetSearch Ezine Staff
> > * http://www.netsearch-ezine.com
> > *
> > */
>
> Sorry, you've got a different copy of Debian 2.2 than the rest of the
> world does... This was fixed in 1.0c16-2, in July, when the problem
> was first discovered.
>
> Dan
>
> /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
> | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
> | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
> | dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
> \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
I got client from bitchx.com and i compiled it.. i didn't know that debian
2.2 had bitchx fixed :(. I'm sorry about the comment "tested in debian
2.2", it can be misinterpreted.
--------------------------------------
RaiSe
UNDERSEC Security Team
NetSearch Ezine Staff
http://www.netsearch-ezine.com
ysfk>2{5~~2s~eska2~}dw2k}g<<< XOR 18
--------------------------------------
