[16402] in bugtraq
Re: swc / ActivCard
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Courtier-Dutton)
Sat Aug 26 02:19:00 2000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <005f01c00ed5$94f6d080$1401a8c0@home>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 21:46:41 +0100
Reply-To: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.demon.co.uk>
From: James Courtier-Dutton <James@SUPERBUG.DEMON.CO.UK>
To: BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM
Anyone looking at the results of the tests performed would know that the
sample size is way too small to get any meaningful answer.
I quick study of standard deviation and standard error would easily show
that any conclusions drawn from that sample are bound to be faulty.
It is total hype if anyone actually believes the results as fact!
FUD rules the world?
Cheers
James
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michal Zalewski" <lcamtuf@DIONE.IDS.PL>
To: <BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM>
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 5:54 PM
Subject: swc / ActivCard
>
> --
>
