[1136] in bugtraq
Re: snooper watchers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Strickland)
Tue Feb 28 19:09:18 1995
From: Karl Strickland <karl@bagpuss.demon.co.uk>
To: Julian Assange <proff@suburbia.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 21:24:54 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: jna@concorde.com, bugtraq@fc.net
In-Reply-To: <199502232321.KAA02896@suburbia.apana.org.au> from "Julian Assange" at Feb 24, 95 10:21:43 am
>
> > The best thing for you to do is completely remove /dev/nit from the system,
> > and make sure noone can get access to mknod to recreate it.
> >
> >
> > -john
>
> Of course you realise that deleting mknod from your system has the incredible
> effect of also removing all copies, and even the kernel calls underlaying
> it from the rest of the universe.
>
whats this mean
is someone saying rm'ing /dev/nit and hacking mknod out of the kernel is better
than just taking nit out of the kernel?
--
------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Mailed using ELM on FreeBSD | Karl Strickland
PGP 2.3a Public Key Available. | Internet: karl@bagpuss.demon.co.uk
|
