[692] in Athena User Interface
Re: Results of MIT usability testing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Susan B. Jones)
Thu Mar 1 09:24:50 2001
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <v04020a04b6c40c0c8a5b@[18.152.1.82]>
In-Reply-To: <200103010020.TAA19029@Press-Your-Luck.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 09:24:45 -0500
To: "Christopher D. Beland" <beland@mit.edu>, Bill Cattey <wdc@mit.edu>
From: "Susan B. Jones" <sbjones@MIT.EDU>
Cc: aui@mit.edu, kcahill@mit.edu
Yes, I do intend to get it in. This week has been pretty too much.
S.
At 7:20 PM -0500 2/28/2001, Christopher D. Beland wrote:
>> I was rather confused by the formatting of the observer notes from
>> beland. How come tester 7 is talked about at the top, then testers
>> 1-4.
>
>Tester 7 was most informative, and I back-reference those results in
>the others.
>
>> What about testers 5 and 6?
>
>I wasn't there for those.
>
>> There may be interesting stuff here, but it was a bit difficult to
>> tease it out. Are there significant insights from these notes that
>> are not merged into the overall tabulations? Is there benefit to
>> formatting this page like the other pages for improved readabilty?
>
>Sorry about the formatting...I thought Susan was going to add in
>everything I had into the main list. While there is a lot of overlap,
>I do have material not listed on the other usability page. I didn't
>have time to merge things myself. I thought if people really cared,
>they'd read through the raw data anyway.
>
>-B.
