| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
To: Richard Tibbetts <tibbetts@MIT.EDU> Cc: Bill Cattey <wdc@MIT.EDU>, aui@MIT.EDU From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@eazel.com> Date: 18 May 2000 19:02:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: Richard Tibbetts's message of "Thu, 18 May 2000 20:18:42 -0400" Message-Id: <lq8zx7cn6j.fsf@pythagoras.eazel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Richard Tibbetts <tibbetts@MIT.EDU> writes: > On 5/18 Bill Cattey <wdc@MIT.EDU> wrote: > > Regrettably, I think we should make our first priority to do what > > the Mac and Windows do with the edges. Right now usability is > > NOT about what we think is correct. It is about what brain-damage > > has been programmed into most of our user base. > > I am not sure to what exent this behavior is programmed into our > users. Further, I think that the default configuration *has* to offer > some way to get back a window that has meandered off the screen. The way many configurations work, you can do this with a right click menu on the border. Sawfish also typically binds Meta+drag-on-the-window to move. > I think the best bet is to leave this to usability testing (yeah, that > stuff that we are theoretically doing). If users really want to resize > on the sides, then we can switch to that. I think that this is a > windows functionality that most users do not expect. I think most users expect it. I can ask some of our big gun UI-heads here if you care for an authoritative opinion short of user testing. - Maciej
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |