[288] in Athena User Interface
Re: GNOME 2.0/Helix for Athena
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Maciej Stachowiak)
Fri Jul 14 14:55:41 2000
To: "Christopher D. Beland" <beland@MIT.EDU>
Cc: aui@MIT.EDU
From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@eazel.com>
Date: 14 Jul 2000 11:55:58 -0700
In-Reply-To: "Christopher D. Beland"'s message of "Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:27:45 -0400"
Message-ID: <lqlmz4y20x.fsf@pythagoras.eazel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
"Christopher D. Beland" <beland@MIT.EDU> writes:
>
> I think there is no danger of Gnome being left by the wayside. It has
> a successful company actively developing it, in addition to an
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> incredible amount of attention in the wider community.
Ahem. Multiple companies. :-)
> Actually, I was wondering why we're using vanilla Gnome 1.2 and not
> the Helix Code distriution, which seems to be updated more frequently
> and have some bug fixes the mainline doesn't.
I don't think you're right that Helix has a lot of bug fixes they
haven't merged into the mainline, since that would be rather rude of
them, but I could be wrong.
Maciej Stachowiak
Hacker
Eazel, Inc.
