[9319] in athena10
Re: [Debathena] #1110: More robust dotfiles
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Debathena Trac)
Sun Jul 1 11:39:49 2012
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: "Debathena Trac" <debathena@MIT.EDU>
Cc: debathena@MIT.EDU
To: jdreed@MIT.EDU
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 15:39:47 -0000
Reply-To:
Message-ID: <057.714da8315fdf3c5575e67ec021aa7a5d@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <042.ee8b2cbc79851bcca6a45f2e7e40af01@mit.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
#1110: More robust dotfiles
--------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: jdreed | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: committed
Priority: normal | Milestone: Precise Beta
Component: -- | Resolution:
Keywords: | Upstream bug:
--------------------+-----------------------------
Comment (by jdreed):
I realized this is a dupe of #920. #920 suggests that we should just
force people to have /bin and /usr/bin in their PATH. Thoughts? We're
all about individual choice and stuff, but I'm not sure there's a valid
reason to ever omit /usr/bin and /bin from your PATH, especially given
Debian Policy regarding the full paths of binaries.
--
Ticket URL: <https://athena10.mit.edu/trac/ticket/1110#comment:3>
Debathena <http://debathena.mit.edu>
MIT Debathena Project
