[8516] in athena10
Re: [Debathena] #203: Common window managers in extra-software-nox
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Debathena Trac)
Mon Sep 26 19:31:42 2011
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: "Debathena Trac" <debathena@MIT.EDU>
Cc: debathena@mit.edu
To: andersk@mit.edu, jdreed@mit.edu
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:31:34 -0000
Reply-To:
Message-ID: <053.e8f170d890e58a8d443120802fbbd893@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <044.92a6a73663ad54d7f1d965f2a4c44029@mit.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
#203: Common window managers in extra-software-nox-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: andersk | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: low | Milestone: The Distant Future
Component: -- | Keywords:
See_also: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by jdreed):
Looking at the number of votes/installations in the lists Anders has, I
don't think we should go all the way down to #20. For example, wmii has
1526 installations compared to metacity's 1062029. That's less than one
percent.
Looking at the popular ones we don't ship, I see xfwm4, kcrap, openbox,
fluxbox, and maximus. (and on the debian side, icewm).
wmii is on both lists, but that doesn't mean much.
I would consider adding xfwm4. openbox vs fluxbox is going to be yet
another wankfest. I don't know what maximus is.
But really, this is not our problem on cluster. If you care that much,
use debathena-workstation.
-- Ticket URL: <http://s-a.mit.edu/~debathena/trac/ticket/203#comment:2>Debathena <http://debathena.mit.edu/>MIT Debathena Project
