[61] in athena10
Re: debathena-build-common and package version numbers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Abbott)
Tue Jan 29 03:22:40 2008
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:21:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Tim Abbott <tabbott@MIT.EDU>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>
cc: athena10@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <1201577661.5864.14.camel@error-messages.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64L.0801290300310.3999@coset.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Ahh, right. Then we probably do want to increase the version number for
the original tarball. We could just do a minor version increase, but that
would be confusing given that previous debathena versions are coupled to
an Athena RPM verison number. So bringing things up to something starting
with 10 makes sense.
Which just leaves open the question of whether we should change things to
Debian-native while changing the version numbers. I think that issue
deserves more discussion now, since it implies a lot of decisions we're
going to have make soon.
-Tim Abbott
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 21:43 -0500, Tim Abbott wrote:
>> Is there an advantage to option #2? Option #1 seems to take slightly less
>> work than #2, and I think has the same relevant properties.
>
> Only that #1 might be considered incorrect since the "orig" tarballs are
> changing (containing less stuff).
>
>
>
