[17807] in athena10

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Can we reuse the drives from the decommissioned 'debuild' machine?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cel Skeggs)
Fri Nov 5 18:02:19 2021

To: <debathena@mit.edu>
CC: sipb-hwops <sipb-hwops@mit.edu>
From: Cel Skeggs <cela@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <f1d6df0f-4e6d-bc9e-2668-3d2c523bd96e@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 18:01:51 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------FC17E54E6D60616250C6DC08"
Content-Language: en-US

--------------FC17E54E6D60616250C6DC08
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi debathena team,

We sent a machine that looked like the following to e-waste as part of 
the last cleanout (it was one of the old machines that had been placed 
in the junk pile at the top of the ramp):

As part of that, we made sure to remove the hard drives (as we did for 
other junk servers) with the intention of securely shredding them. 
Specifically, we recovered two 500 GB disks. However, we're now thinking 
that debuild, as a (presumed) build server, might not actually have 
actually had any sensitive user data on it, which might mean that secure 
shredding is unnecessary in this case.

Could you confirm whether or not debuild had any sensitive user data on 
it? If not, do you have any objections to the drives being wiped and 
reused within the SMR for other SIPB services?

Thanks,
Cel Skeggs
SIPB HWOPS



--------------FC17E54E6D60616250C6DC08
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hi debathena team,</p>
    <p>We sent a machine that looked like the following to e-waste as
      part of the last cleanout (it was one of the old machines that had
      been placed in the junk pile at the top of the ramp):<br>
    </p>
    <p><span style="font-size:13.999999999999998pt;font-family:Arial;color:#434343;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;" id="docs-internal-guid-5930584e-7fff-e121-88b8-074b2ba1323b"><span style="border:none;display:inline-block;overflow:hidden;width:248px;height:358px;"><img src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/DHpGC0xibhe7-bm_ApbMHuk51_J6DF9Q9rjeVqKgePvfIJS70tuykluGwFeaXBGDXLzk472NfdC5aDn22CRnb8XGldUhGLuFeqnUQ_u2CPtHNeydTYnmkeMmi3qP-_-9q3HS4uTm" style="margin-left: -25.8973px; margin-top: -8.01908e-13px;" width="273.89734513274334" height="366.79031070685073">
</span></span></p>
    <p>As part of that, we made sure to remove the hard drives (as we
      did for other junk servers) with the intention of securely
      shredding them. Specifically, we recovered two 500 GB disks.
      However, we're now thinking that debuild, as a (presumed) build
      server, might not actually have actually had any sensitive user
      data on it, which might mean that secure shredding is unnecessary
      in this case.<br>
    </p>
    <p>Could you confirm whether or not debuild had any sensitive user
      data on it? If not, do you have any objections to the drives being
      wiped and reused within the SMR for other SIPB services?</p>
    <p>Thanks,<br>
      Cel Skeggs<br>
      SIPB HWOPS</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>

--------------FC17E54E6D60616250C6DC08--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post