[1729] in athena10
Re: hesiod -> ldap for groups?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jacob Morzinski)
Mon Mar 16 18:02:11 2009
From: Jacob Morzinski <jmorzins@MIT.EDU>
To: "geofft@mit.edu" <geofft@mit.edu>
CC: "athena10@mit.edu" <athena10@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:01:08 -0400
Message-ID: <C5E44464.2BDAF%jmorzins@exchange.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903150458410.6214@geminorum.mit.edu>
Content-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I explicitly checked each LDAP server.
Win.mit.edu does know Moira group IDs.
Win.mit.edu does require a Kerberized connection.
Ldap.mit.edu does not know Moira group IDs.
Ldap.mit.edu does not require a Kerberized connection.
I'm trying to provide information without providing opinion, but I think
Mitch's concern about "whether the various LDAP domains would be willing to
change their promised support levels" is well placed.
-Jacob
On 3/15/09 5:01 AM, "Geoffrey Thomas" <geofft@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> Hm, did we ever get anywhere on this discussion, e.g. getting either
> ldap.mit.edu or win.mit.edu's LDAP servers to give us GIDs? One more
> comment is below...
