[1001] in athena10
Re: /svn/athena r23357 - trunk/debathena/config/libpam-krb5-config/debian
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Price)
Tue Jan 27 02:02:52 2009
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:01:53 -0500
From: Greg Price <price@MIT.EDU>
To: Tim Abbott <tabbott@mit.edu>
Cc: debathena@mit.edu
Message-ID: <20090127070153.GB2298@vinegar-pot.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0901270028060.23195@vinegar-pot.mit.edu>
There are several other Debathena-native packages where the Debian
packaging is written as copyright Tim Abbott and Anders Kaseorg:
broder: cupsys-config, printing-config, cupsys-hack
MIT: dotfiles, firefox-wrapper, build-depends
andersk: libnss-afspag
tabbott, broder, nelhage, andersk, geofft: linerva
tabbott, andersk, geofft: gdm-config
tabbott, andersk, price: pam-config
Are these right? I think it may make the most sense to drop the
"source is copyright X, packaging copyright Y" distinction for many of
these packages, especially for config packages that consist basically
just of Debian packaging.
The same thing applies to a large number of config packages where both
copyrights are attributed to Tim and Anders, or both to MIT.
I only examined the debathena/ tree because I don't have a checkout
handy of everything, but if someone with a checkout wants to look, try:
md5sum $(find . -name copyright) | sort
and to look at each unique file:
less $(md5sum $(find . -name copyright) | sort \
| perl -lane 'if ($F[0] ne $val) { $val = $F[0]; print $F[1]; }')
Greg
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:28:40AM -0500, Tim Abbott wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Greg Price wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 07:58:30PM -0500, Tim Abbott wrote:
> >>You're the author of this package and thus are the copyright holder, but
> >>the debian/copyright file did not reflect this; I've changed it to do so.
> >>Feel free to revert the copyright change if you think I was in error.
> >
> >Indeed, thanks. It now says the Debian packaging is copyright you and
> >Anders, though, which isn't right either. I'll fix that.
>
> Oops! Yes, please do.
>
> -Tim Abbott
