[34] in Zephyr_Bugs
[jik@pit-manager.MIT.EDU: rt 7.0F: ]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathan I. Kamens)
Tue Jun 19 07:37:19 1990
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 90 07:37:02 -0400
From: "Jonathan I. Kamens" <jik@pit-manager.MIT.EDU>
To: bug-zephyr@ATHENA.MIT.EDU, rel-eng@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
What should happen here? Should /usr/include/syslog.h be reconciled
with the one in the zephyr source tree? Also, where did the one in
the zephyr source tree come from, and why is /usr/include/syslog.h
different?
jik
----- Forwarded message
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 90 03:05:43 -0400
From: "Jonathan I. Kamens" <jik@pit-manager.MIT.EDU>
Sender: jik@PIT-MANAGER.MIT.EDU
To: bugs@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Subject: rt 7.0F: <syslog.h>
System name: pit-manager
Type and version: RTPC-ROMPC 7.0F
Display type: apa16
megapel
What were you trying to do?
Compare
/source/athena/athena.lib/zephyr/clients/syslogd/syslog.h with
/usr/include/syslog.h.
What's wrong:
They're significantly different. Some constants (e.g.
LOG_UUCP, LOG_NEWS) which should appear in both only appear in
the zephyr version.
What should have happened:
They should be synchronized.
jik
----- End of forwarded message
