[3767] in SAPr3-news
Complaints against NT-Remote..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bart V)
Wed Sep 17 02:37:11 1997
To: sapr3-news@MIT.EDU
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 02:40:56 -0400
From: "bart V" <bart@panix.com>
Folks,
NT is very much designed for remote operation, provided you have proper
tools. Chechout Hyena, the remote tool for NT which works good. There are
several other tools too. I have the URL at my work. Email me at
bart@panix.com if there are any qns.
Also, checkout this unpublished MicroSoft site with plenty of
info http://microsoft.com/ntserver/tools/
good lucks
--
Jochen Hein wrote in article ...>>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Guenther
<a.guenther@haithabu.bonbit.org> writes:
>
> Andreas> I also don't like NT, but we have found a program, what
> Andreas> allows us to control every NT-Computer (server or client) in
> Andreas> a TCP/IP-network. We use it now for about 2 month and it
> Andreas> looks good. It's named PC-Duo. The only problem: you have to
> Andreas> pay it extra, it's not part of NT.
>
>NT isn't designed for remote operation. I sometimes use telnet, but
>that's very slow and unstable.
>
>Is NT with PC-Duo still certified as an SAP-plattform? I suspect that
>the X or multi-user additions to NT kill that certificate.
>
>Jochen
>
