[24] in Project_DB
Re: restrict issue categories?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim McGovern)
Tue Feb 25 08:17:57 1997
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 08:17:49 -0400
To: Bill Cattey <wdc@MIT.EDU>
From: tjm@MIT.EDU (Tim McGovern)
Cc: brlewis@MIT.EDU (Bruce R. Lewis), project-db@MIT.EDU
At 4:29 PM 2/24/1997, Bill Cattey wrote:
>Tim: Do you think we should have a category for issues?
>Do you think it makes sense to even make a distinction of the
>developer/supplier versus the customer in naming issues?
I think that category could be useful. For smaller projects,
a PM might choose to leave the few issues classified as
GENERAL, for example. For large projects, it might make the PM's
life easier if they can sort out VENDOR issues from MIT
INFRASTRUCTURE issues, from DESIGN issues, etc. So, I would
leave the field, but let the PM use good judgment to classify
things as appropriate.
Tim
