[215] in Project_DB
Re: Getting up-to-date, and setting next meeting day
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brenda Gillingham)
Thu Sep 18 08:02:04 1997
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 08:01:56 -0400
To: Mike Barker <mbarker@MIT.EDU>
From: Brenda Gillingham <brendakg@MIT.EDU>
Cc: project-db@MIT.EDU
I know of no later message resolving the 2 agendas, but can we treat them as
ONE - and prioritize topics at the start of the meeting?
Brenda
At 17:59 97/09/17 EDT, Mike Barker wrote:
>I realize no one is going to read this before the meeting, but there
>seem to be two agendas? Or is there a later message where the different
>emphases were resolved?
>
>thanks
>mike
>
>From: Tim McGovern <tjm@MIT.EDU>
>Subject: Re: Getting up-to-date, and setting next meeting day
>Cc: project-db@MIT.EDU
>
>At 4:22 PM -0400 9/2/97, Brenda Gillingham wrote:
>>That's where we are as of the 28th. Want to chat about an
>>agenda for the 18th?
>
>That would be good. Let me start:
>
>1. Agenda Review & Adjust
>2. Recap of Operational Problems
>3. QUICK review of progress on the action items posted Fri, 8 Aug 1997
>15:59:44.
> (mail included below)
>4. Review any remaining V2 deliverables
> (FAQ, project-db home page, glossary of terms, etc.)
>5. Planning for V2 rollout / gaps, etc. / resource availability, etc.
>6. Adjourn
>
>Tim
>
>-------
>From: Bill Cattey <wdc@MIT.EDU>
>Subject: Re: Getting up-to-date, and setting next meeting day
>
>Agenda:
> Take stock of V2 deployment.
> Review previous action items:
>
> TJM's V2 feedback.
> project notebook home page
> end-user documentation home page
> FAQ
> V2 Release Notes
> Identification of who is supporting the service
> Identification of who is servicing the service
>
>
>
