[895] in libertarians

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Pledge DIES in MA!! Join NOW!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (C. D. Tavares)
Tue Apr 18 20:23:26 1995

From: "C. D. Tavares" <cdt@sw.stratus.com>
To: libertarians@MIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 20:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <9504182334.AA22492@schooner.MIT.EDU> from "Vernon Imrich" at Apr 18, 95 07:34:19 pm

> 1) The state law -- now that we are an official third party in MA,
> we have two options.  Fight political party legal constraints, or 
> adopt them.  One of those constraints is that anyone who registers
> under the party monaker is de facto a party member.  No fee, duty, 
> signature, or other requirement can be made.  There is some other
> stuff in the law, about how members can appoint delegates, vote
> and so forth, but nothing controversial (most of it, a very wise
> way of organizing by all accounts).

> 2) The "split" -- rather than spend countless waisted dollars in
> legal fees, money which can otherwise go to candidates, outreach
> and real political activism, it was decided to "split" the current
> organization into two entities.  

> 	(A) The Libertarian Party of MA -- is the official party
> 	of the commonwealth of MA.  No fee, no requirement.  Any
> 	one registering L is a voting party member, able to go
> 	to convention, nominate candidates, and so forth.

> 	(B) The Libertarian Association (a temporary name) -- is
> 	a new organization with the same requirements for membership
> 	and participation that the old party had.  It will act in
> 	concert with the party, much like the DNC, DLC, or RNC, GOPAC,
> 	and RLC work with the Democrats and Republicans respectively.
> 	It's control will lie in it's ability to fund candidates
> 	(it's the only entity with a fund base) and influence
> 	delegations.

> 3) What it all means -- like the current major "public" parties,
> the Libertarian Party of MA is now public.  We'll have open
> primaries for nominations and all of that.  Within that structure,
> and paralleling the way the D's and R's operate, we'll have a 
> large fundraising "PAC style" organization that directs the
> operations by virtue of it's organizational, monetary, and 
> intellectual strength.

Sounds to me like anyone who is registered Libertarian has a right
under the law to run as a Libertarian, and the "association" can no
longer limit the ticket to pledge signers.
-- 

cdt@rocket.sw.stratus.com   --If you believe that I speak for my company,
                              write today for my special Investors' Packet...


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post