[819] in Kerberos_V5_Development

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[Theodore Ts'o: Re: krb5 work]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o)
Tue Jul 19 23:59:06 1994

Date: Tue, 19 Jul 94 23:58:50 EDT
From: tytso@MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o)
To: krbdev@MIT.EDU

FYI....

------- Forwarded Message

Date: Tue, 19 Jul 94 23:38:34 EDT
From: tytso@MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o)
To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@cygnus.com>
In-Reply-To: Ken Raeburn's message of Tue, 19 Jul 1994 20:39:42 -0400,
	<199407200039.UAA21654@cujo.cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: krb5 work
Address: 1 Amherst St., Cambridge, MA 02139
Phone: (617) 253-8091

   From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@cygnus.com>
   Date: Tue, 19 Jul 1994 20:39:42 -0400

   I've been spending too much time nitpicking in the v4 sources here; it's
   about time I do something useful with the time.  (Not that it's a *lot*
   of time, mind you, but I do have some.)  How would you feel about giving
   me access to the v5 sources?

Sure, sounds great!  I've added you to the lists (groups) krbdev,
cvs-krb5, and krb5-bugs.

   Unless I really get psyched, I probably wouldn't look at much besides
   Alpha support (including general 64-bit issues), NetBSD support,
   Makefile and autoconf problems, appropriate uses of "const" and "static"
   (my pet peeve), namespace pollution, possibly performance issues.  But
   you never know -- I might get psyched to do some real work too, like
   getting applications to build. :-)

Sounds good.  If you want to start getting applications to build, at
this point we should start using the krbdev list to do more
communications; there are enough of us that word-of-mouth is probably
not the best idea.

						- Ted

------- End Forwarded Message

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post